Last weekend, I spent a lot of time going back over Kierkegaard texts, in preparation for an exam (miraculously already graded and passed, so I must be an expert on this topic). I was struck with a vertiginous sense that all of this, the play of names, the variety of genres, etc. — all of it fits together into a unified whole. All of it can be taken into account and systemaized. In fact, “systematized” might not be the right word: it already is a system, one revealed progressively from a variety of perspectives, but integral and coherent.
I obviously can’t demonstrate this in the context of a blog post, but if I ever do demonstrate it, it will be in a book entitled Kierkegaard’s System — a book of under 200 pages, most likely.
An und für sich 
Now, wouldn’t that be ironic.
It would set up a kind of infinite regress problem.
This is a joke, right?
Sorry, but I have a tin ear for blog tone.
Therein: lies the irony.
Nobody would know that Adam wrote it, of course. It may be already out.
You could call it “Point of View of His Work as an Author”.